Linkbreakers vs Cutt.ly: branded links vs interactive QR campaigns

Short answer

Choose Cutt.ly when branded short-link management is the primary requirement. Choose Linkbreakers when you need QR campaigns that include interaction steps and deeper scan analytics.

Comparison criteria

Criterion	Linkbreakers	Cutt.ly
Primary strength	Interactive QR workflows	Branded short-link operations
QR interaction logic	Yes	No
Contact cards	Yes	No
A/B testing style	Workflow/funnel optimization	Link destination optimization
Team structure	Workspace-oriented governance	Link campaign organization

Best fit by use case

Choose Linkbreakers when

• You need forms, routing, or conditional steps after scan
• You want QR analytics tied to downstream actions
• You use QR for events, field sales, or offline attribution

Choose Cutt.ly when

• You need branded links at scale
• You prioritize link-level campaign operations
• You need straightforward QR generation attached to link workflows

Limits and caveats

• Confirm feature details by plan and region.
• Check export and retention limits before migration.
• Run proof-of-concept campaigns before full replacement.

Frequently asked questions

Are both tools suitable for SMB campaigns? Yes. The best choice depends on whether your process is link-first or QR-interaction-first.

Can I use custom domains on both? Usually yes on paid tiers, but domain limits differ by plan.

Does one platform always have better ROI? No. ROI depends on campaign model, instrumentation, and execution quality.

Additional context

Use this page as a baseline reference and validate details against your current campaign setup, reporting requirements, and compliance obligations before rollout.