Linkbreakers vs T.ly: QR analytics and customization comparison

Short answer

Choose Linkbreakers if your priority is interactive QR workflows and deeper QR-focused analytics. Choose T.ly if your primary need is lightweight short-link management with QR support.

Comparison criteria

Criterion	Linkbreakers	T.ly
QR design controls	Advanced visual customization	Basic customization
Interactive workflow steps	Yes	No
Contact cards (vCard)	Yes	No
Analytics model	QR journey and workflow events	Click and link analytics
Team governance	Workspace roles and shared organization	Basic collaboration

Best fit by use case

Choose Linkbreakers when

• You need lead capture or form steps after a scan
• You need contact cards and workflow-level analytics
• Your team needs stronger campaign governance

Choose T.ly when

• You mainly need short links with optional QR generation
• You prefer a simpler setup for basic campaigns
• Your reporting needs are mostly click-level

Limits and caveats

• Feature availability and limits can change by plan.
• Validate retention windows and API limits before committing.
• Run a pilot with your top two campaign types before migration.

Frequently asked questions

Can both platforms create dynamic QR codes? Yes, but they differ in workflow depth and analytics detail.

Which one is better for networking/contact exchange? Linkbreakers, because it includes contact-card workflows.

Should I decide on price alone? No. Compare fit for your reporting and campaign process first.

Additional context

Use this page as a baseline reference and validate details against your current campaign setup, reporting requirements, and compliance obligations before rollout.